Sunday, April 14, 2024

If you are Antiochian, this video will make your day

As the Antiochian Archdiocese rebounds from an international scandal, it should be a point of pride and cause for no little delight to watch the below. 

Have you been praying for true monasticism in America? It's coming.

  • Measured in months, look to Memphis for this effort to begin. But, also look to your own children because Met. Saba is clear that families need to support their own going to the monasteries.

Have you been praying for growth in the church? Missions are being planted.

  • A sure sign of health is the planting of missions in one register and the continued life of existing parishes in the other. 

Have you been praying for more bishops to guide the archdiocese? Keep praying.

  • Met. Saba is clear that the archdiocese needs new bishops, but they need to not be cause for more instability. They need to be trained properly.

Further effort will be put into Christian education.

  • This will be my sole point of contention with this video. If you were to make a pie chart about how much Christian education was unique to a jurisdiction, it would be a very small slice. Almost all of it is the shared patrimony of the entire Orthodox Church. And yet we continue to have departments of Christian education divided by jurisdiction or even diocese for no good reason. We repeat things, we don't share graphics or curricula or timely offerings, and we put out an inferior product as a result. If you want to search and replace for specific terms in texts, it makes perfect sense to call something an epitaphios or a plashchanitsa or a naash for particular consumption but that should not stop us from working together. 


Saturday, April 13, 2024

An end to the Zoghby Initiative

Metropolitan Elias (Zoghby) was a vocal proponent of the "Orthodox in communion with Rome" idea that many Greek Catholics in America have subscribed to. At the same time I remember speaking to Archbishop Basil (Schott) of the Ruthenian archeparchy who described Greek Catholicism as neither Roman nor Orthodox, but its own "third way." Honestly, there are as many identities of what it means to be Greek Catholic as their are people you'll run into on any given Sunday at one of their parishes. As this article states later:

"This option, for us Melkite Greek Catholics, means a reorientation. Even today, we counted ourselves as interlocutors between the Catholic and Orthodox sides and we said of this dialogue that we were the bridge that connects them. But the failure of the initiative in the way that it happened blocked the path and posed questions for us that we should not be afraid to put a finger on now: Does this failure threaten our mission? Do we remain suspended over the bridge that we have built? Has the time not come for us to plant our feet on this or that side of the river?"

It was always hoped by some that the Melkite Church could form a bridge between the two larger groups of Orthodoxy and Catholicism. Still others considered the very existence of "Uniatism" to be an added impediment to that hoped for unity. It seems there has been a decided pivot in a new direction. Where it will go I do not know.


(Notes on Arab Orthodoxy) - A response to Patriarch John X's speech at Balamand last October and for Patriarch Absi's very clear statement that from his perspective "in dogma and canon law, we are Catholics, and in liturgy and sacramental life we are Byzantines", quite different from the vision of "Orthodox in communion with Rome" sometimes promoted among followers of the late Metropolitan Elias Zoghby.

The Speech of His Beatitude Yusuf in Honor of Metropolitan Yusuf al-Klas

Sunday, April 7, 2024

al-Liqa' Centre, Rabwa, Lebanon

My speech today at this gathering in honor of His Eminence, the beloved brother and father Yusuf al-Klas, former metropolitan of Beirut, Jbeil and the dependencies for the Melkite Catholics, centers on the book that he has worked for months to prepare together with the Rev Basilian Fr Nicholas Bustros under the supervision of the Rev Fr Gabi Hachem, which was published about a week ago with the title The Effort for Fraternal Reconiciliation in Antioch: History and an Analysis of the Initiative of the Melkite Greek Catholic Synod, 1996-1997. The book and my speech are thus both abut the initiative that was born in the mind and heart of His Eminence Metropolitan Elias Zoghby, of thrice-blessed memory, which was adopted by our church's synod and proposed to the Synod of the Byzantine Antiochian Orthodox Church.

The initiative that we are discussing is, in short, for the Melkite Catholics to belong at the same time to the Catholic Church and to the Byzantine Antiochian Orthodox Church, for them to have a double affiliation, such that the desired unity between them and the Greek Orthodox takes place while they remain in communion with the Catholic Church. Nevertheless, they did not precisely or finally define how this affiliation would be in practice and how it would be arranged, remaining content to make some observations...

Complete article here.

Saturday, April 6, 2024

Elevation to chorepiscopi in the Malankara Church

By way of explanation...

  • What is a "Chorbishop"? Historically, a rural bishop that served many of the functions of a bishop without the full authority to do all things a normal bishop might do. It died out in the West and in Orthodoxy, but remains in Oriental Orthodoxy and elsewhere.
  • What is a a "Valiyapally"? A "principal church" - a title given to a main church in a diocese of the Christian denominations Jacobite Syrian Christian Church, Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church,Malankara Mar Thoma Syrian Church.


Friday, April 5, 2024

Metropolitan Saba on better serving the people of the archdiocese

First, I have to commend the Antiochian archdiocese for the quality of this video production. As I have said before, some jurisdictions do amazing work while others are stuck in the '90s.

It cannot be easy to come in after the scandal and the legal battle that followed so these sit-down talks are important. It is interesting to see that deacons are being considered for expansion and an expanded role. As almost no one pays their deacons, will this growth spur a change there?


Monday, April 1, 2024

EP calls different Paschal dates a "scandal"

(Orthodox Times) - Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew extended in his homily his heartfelt wishes to all the non-Orthodox Christians who celebrated the Holy Easter on Sunday, March 31, after presiding over the Sunday Divine Liturgy at the Church of Saint Theodore of the Community of Vlanga.

“On this day, the timeless message of the Resurrection resonates more profoundly than ever, as our non-Orthodox Christian brethren and sisters commemorate the resurrection of our Lord from the dead, celebrating Holy Easter. We have already sent our representatives to all the Christian Communities of the confessions here, to extend our heartfelt wishes of the Holy Great Church of Christ and our Patriarchal congratulations.

But also from this position we extend a heartfelt greeting of love to all Christians around the world who celebrate Holy Easter today. We beseech the Lord of Glory that the forthcoming Easter celebration next year will not merely be a fortuitous occurrence, but rather the beginning of a unified date for its observance by both Eastern and Western Christianity. What does this mean?

This aspiration is particularly significant in light of the upcoming 1700th anniversary in 2025, marking the convening of the First Ecumenical Synod in Nicaea. Among its pivotal discussions was the matter of establishing a common timeframe for the Easter festivities. We are optimistic, as there is goodwill and willingness on both sides. Because, indeed, it is a scandal to celebrate separately the unique event of the one Resurrection of the One Lord!

Earlier, on the occasion of the feast of Saint Gregory Palamas, Archbishop of Thessaloniki, the Ecumenical Patriarch noted:

Saturday, March 30, 2024

Shuffling of hierarchs in the GOA

BOSTON (TNH via OCL) – Metropolitan Isaiah of Denver has resigned and the Synod of the Phanar in Constantinople, with Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew presiding, has elected him Metropolitan of Lystra, an honorary position.

The National Herald in its publication on Friday, March 15, 2024, titled ‘Eparchial Synod Meets, Elect Two new Bishops for Archdiocese of America’ also reported on other matters addressed by the Synod and revealed, among other things, the following: “Extensive discussion took place regarding Metropolitan Isaiah of Denver, who has been residing for several months now at the Monastery of the Archangels in Kendalia, TX, and not in his Metropolis while refusing to resign. The Metropolis of Denver is essentially being governed and administered by Auxiliary Bishop Constantine of Sasima.”

TNH also reported that “it was decided at the Eparchial Synod of the Archdiocese of America that Archbishop Elpidophoros would visit him [Met. Isaiah] at the Monastery in Texas, conduct an on-site inspection, and diagnose his overall condition to determine whether he is able to fulfill his episcopal duties, and based on this, the Synod would make a decision.”

Archbishop Elpidophoros visited the Monastery in Texas where Metropolitan Isaiah resides on Thursday, March 21, and received his resignation, which he conveyed to Patriarch Bartholomew.

Australia gains eparchial synod

(EP-AU) - It is with profound praise and gratitude to the Triune God, that the Holy Archdiocese of Australia cements its ecclesiological existence, relevance, and maturity, through the acquisition of its very own Eparchial Synod. Through God’s Grace, the Holy Archdiocese of Australia will have its own Synod of Bishops, glory be to God for all things! In response to our vast nation with its prominent regional areas, our synod will consist of an Archbishop together with his suffragan bishops. Such a precious gift from God, as ratified in principle in the rules of the Holy Archdiocese’s new Constitution, is a cause of celebration for all the faithful living in the Antipodes. The pioneering work towards this sacred task came through the vision and steadfastness of His Eminence Archbishop Makarios of Australia, whose illuminating wisdom, selfless stewardship, and pastoral solicitude, materialised into a Constitution that elevates the Holy Archdiocese of Australia into an ecclesiastical realm that not only best responds to the needs of its faithful but also completes all that is lacking in our Holy Archdiocese’s witness and ministry. For now, and forever, our Holy Archdiocese is secured and equipped for all that is, and for all that will ensure, all for the providential glory of God and our salvation. We are all eternally grateful to His All-Holiness, Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew, and the honourable Synodical Hierarchs of our Ecumenical Patriarchate, for approving in principle our new Constitution and thank them for their continuous prayers and guidance.

Scripture and Tradition in the Church – The Synod of Bishops

It is true that the basis of the Orthodox Church’s theological teachings is founded upon the dual authority of Scripture and tradition (παράδοσις), especially when the latter has to do with the lives of holy men and women of the past. Scripture is not juxtaposed to tradition, like equal measures of weight on a balanced scale, but rather is constitutive of tradition. On the other hand, as fundamental as Scripture is to tradition’s existence, it is certainly not exhaustive of tradition. Tradition rather is the culmination of the written and the unwritten (ἄγραφα) sources of witness, a heritage handed on from one person to another. In this sense, tradition, is the body of knowledge belonging to the whole church, and includes “the apostolic traditions” (ἀποστολικαὶ παραδόσεις) and “the teachings of the Fathers” (τὰ τῶν Πατέρων δόγματα). When the Fathers of the Church sensed that a divergence from tradition had taken place they would emphatically proclaim: “This was not what that holy and God-beloved synod had in mind.”[1] It was left to the synod of bishops to “canonically and legally promulgate” truths through a “synodical letter” (τῷ συνοδικῷ γράμματι κανονικῶς καὶ ἐνθέσμως δεδογματισμένοις).[2]

AFR tackles Chalcedon

Scheduled for Apr 2, 2024 - Ancient Faith Today - Two Natures: Examining Chalcedon and Communion

Most of us know about the Great Schism, which tragically divided the Christian Church between East and West in 1054. But there was another earlier division in the 5th century following the Fourth Ecumenical Council in Chalcedon in 451, which clarified how Jesus is both God and man. What specifically separates us theologically? What efforts have been made to better understand each other in recent decades? On the next special edition of Ancient Faith Today, Fr. Tom Soroka and John Maddex will take a deep dive into the causes of our division and what any path to unity might involve. The conversation will not downplay any theological concerns but rather shed a light on those concerns giving us a better grasp on what is at stake. Scholars participating include: Dr. Sam Noble, Dr. David Ford, Fr. Joseph Lucas, Dr. Emmanuel Gergis, Christine Chaillon, Fr. Timothy Thomas, Fr. Chad Hatfield, and Dr. Peter Bouteneff.⁠

CHAT DISCLAIMER

We will remove any comments or participants who are not engaging with the documentary appropriately. Opposing views and disagreement are welcome; rudeness will not be tolerated.

Do not spam, goad others, deliberately misconstrue arguments, or insult presenters. This chat will be restricted to subscribers-only and slow-mode will be activated for the entire duration of the show.


Friday, March 29, 2024

Abp. Michael on the road

Enjoy a little Lenten music

Friday, March 15, 2024

Former head of Antiochian Archdiocese, Met. Joseph, laicized

Nothing about this makes me think this topic is over. I expect the legal wrangling to continue. 


(antiochian.org) - The Holy Antiochian Synod, presided by His Beatitude Patriarch JOHN X (Yazigi), held its eighteenth extraordinary session in Balamand from March 13 to March 14, 2024, in the presence of Their Eminences:

Elias (Archdiocese of Beirut and dependencies); Elias (Archdiocese of Tyre, Sidon and dependencies); Saba (Archdiocese of New York and All North America); Silouan (Archdiocese of Byblos, Botrys and dependencies); Basilios (Archdiocese of Akkar and dependencies); Ephrem (Archdiocese of Tripoli, Koura and dependencies); Ignatius (Archdiocese of France, Western and Southern Europe); Isaac (Archdiocese of Germany and Central Europe); Ghattas (Archdiocese of Baghdad, Kuwait and dependencies); Antonios (Archdiocese of Zahleh, Baalbek and dependencies); Nicolas (Archdiocese of Hama and dependencies); Basilios (Archdiocese of Australia, New Zealand and the Philippines); Athanasius (Archdiocese of Lattakia and dependencies); Ephrem (Archdiocese of Aleppo, Alexandretta, and dependencies); Nifon Saikali (Metropolitan of Philippopolis and Representative of the Patriarch of Antioch to the Patriarch of Moscow); Gregorios (Archdiocese of Homs and dependencies); Antonios (Archdiocese of Bosra Hauran and Jabal Al-Arab). Also present was His Grace Bishop Romanos El-Hannat, Patriarchal Vicar and Secretary of the Holy Synod.

The Metropolitans who apologized for being unable to attend are as follows: Damaskinos (Archdiocese of São Paulo and All Brazil); Silouan (Archdiocese of the British Isles and Ireland); Ignatius (Archdiocese of Mexico, Venezuela, Central America and the Caribbean Islands); and Jacques (Archdiocese of Buenos Aires and All Argentina). Despite his physical absence caused by his kidnapping, Metropolitan Boulos Yazigi is always present in the prayers and invocations of the Synod Fathers.

At the dawn of Great Lent, the Synod Fathers offer their sincere prayers for the faithful of the Church of Antioch, asking the Lord that this period may be a time of intimacy with God, a consolation to hearts, and a victory in adversity. 

Thursday, March 14, 2024

How Bulgaria got a Patriarchate

Autocephaly is messy business. Gaining it is often a raucous game of King of the Hill, with as much loud outrage and overblown cries of triumph as the children's recess favorite occasions. A patriarchate is usually made contrary to the canons and only gains legitimacy much later. This is also not a growth pain relegated to the history books. The OCU is a glaring example of how badly such a process can go and is only four years old.

But you don't have to go across the ocean to see this conflict-laden process in action. See how authority and recognition differ from the Ecumenical Patriarchate's assumed authority through the view of most of the earth being their "diaspora." Look at how the Orthodox Church in America announced autocephaly some fifty-odd years ago to continued mixed reception. See how yet another body of Russian origin (ROCOR) coexists - however imperfectly - in the same territory of not only the OCA, but also the Moscow Patriarchate parishes here. 

So it is with the Bulgarian people. A long and winding road to today's current situation that is well worth reading for context on the repose of the primate this week and the process of elevating his successor in the coming weeks.


(Orthodox History) - In 1767, the Ottoman Empire had suppressed the Patriarchate of Ohrid and subordinated its Bulgarian Orthodox people to the Ecumenical Patriarchate. Beginning in the early 1830s, the Bulgarian Orthodox subjects of the Empire began agitating for the restoration of their own church. In 1838, Sultan Mahmud II visited the Bulgarian provinces of the Empire and the people petitioned him for Bulgarian-speaking bishops. The same year, the Greek speaking Metropolitan of Tarnovo (a small city in north central Bulgaria) died, and the people pushed for one of their own, Fr Neofit Bozveli, to succeed him. The Ecumenical Patriarchate rejected this and imposed another Greek speaker ; Bozveli responded by moving to Constantinople and giving speeches to the Bulgarians in the city, calling for the creation of a Bulgarian parish in the capital city itself.

In 1841, Bozveli was arrested in Constantinople and exiled to Mount Athos. The reason for this punishment was Bozveli’s refusal to accept the appointment of an ethnically Greek bishop to the see of Tarnovo – a see to which Bozveli himself had been nominated by the local Bulgarians, only to be rejected by Constantinople.

In 1848, the Ecumenical Patriarchate finally agreed to the construction of a Bulgarian church and school in Constantinople. It was consecrated the following year, and, for the time being, remained subordinate to the Ecumenical Patriarch.

In 1851, the Ecumenical Patriarchate, facing a growing call from the Bulgarian people for bishops of their own nationality, decided instead to appoint a Serb, Stefan Kovacevic, as a bishop for the Bulgarians. This satisfied neither the Bulgarians nor the Greeks, and Stefan was ultimately removed from his see.

Two years later, the Crimean War broke out. Thousands of Bulgarians, along with Greeks, Serbs, and Romanians living in the Ottoman Empire, volunteered to fight on the side of Russia, forming their own Orthodox legion. As the conflict raged Russia pulled its embassy out of Constantinople, and the Ecumenical Patriarchate came under the increasing influence of the British Empire. When the war ended and the Russians resumed diplomatic relations with the Ottomans, their relationship with the Ecumenical Patriarchate had cooled. From now on, Russia would no longer support the Greek hierarchy, instead spending its diplomatic capital to benefit the laity of the Patriarchate. This would come to include a sympathy toward the Bulgarians’ desire for their own church. In 1857, the Russian Church appointed St Theophan the Recluse – then a hieromonk and not yet a recluse – to serve as the Russian church’s representative in Constantinople. Theophan sympathized with the Bulgarian cause, taking the position that they should be allowed to have their own hierarchy and clergy and worship in Slavonic rather than Greek...

Complete article here

How a new head of the Bulgarian Church is selected

(Orthodox Times) - The Church of Bulgaria should elect a new Patriarch within four months after the death of Patriarch Neophyte.

The election of his successor will take place according to a specific procedure. The Bulgarian Orthodox Church has 13 dioceses in Bulgaria and two abroad. The Church Statute regulates the election of the Patriarch and the conditions for his election.

Specifically, the Patriarch of Bulgaria and the Metropolitan of Sofia must not be younger than 50 years of age, must have served as a Metropolitan for at least five years, and must be distinguished by Orthodox faith and strict adherence to the rules of the Church.

The Patriarch is elected by the Patriarchal Ecclesiastical Council, which consists of:

  • Metropolitans and Bishops of the Bulgarian Orthodox Church
  • Five representatives from each diocese (three clergy and two lay) and ten representatives from the Metropolis of Sofia (six clergy and four lay).
  • One representative from the Stavropegian Monasteries (Rila, Bachkovo, Troyan), elected by the respective Monastery Councils
  • Two representatives from the Episcopal Monasteries of each diocese (one monk/nun designated by the respective Metropolitan and one representative from the Theological Schools designated by their administrations).

After the death of the Patriarch, the Holy Synod is temporarily chaired by the senior member of the Metropolitan Council in its reduced composition.

He notifies the local Orthodox Churches of the Patriarch’s death, as well as the President of the country, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and the Prime Minister, who manages the affairs of the Patriarchate until the election of the Vice-President, which must take place within seven days of the Patriarch’s death.

Bulgarian Primate reposes in the Lord

(Sofia Globe) - Neofit, Patriarch of the Bulgarian Orthodox Church and thus the head of its governing body the Holy Synod, has died at the age of 78, according to statements on March 13 by Metropolitan Antoniy and the Military Medical Academy, where Neofit had been admitted some months ago with a lung ailment.

Metropolitan Neofit of Rousse was elected as the new Patriarch of the Bulgarian Orthodox Church on February 24 2013, succeeding the long-standing Patriarch, Maxim.

Neofit was born in Sofia on October 15 1945 under the name Simeon Nikolov.

He was ordained a monk on August 3 1975 in the Troyan Monastery. Neofit rose through the church ranks, becoming Metropolitan of Rousse in 2001.

By the canonical law of the Bulgarian Orthodox Church, the death of the Patriarch means that the Holy Synod is temporarily headed by the most senior Metropolitan, pending the election of a new Patriarch.

The election of a new Patriarch takes place no later than four months after the death of the incumbent.

Currently, the Holy Synod is short of one Metropolitan, that of Sliven, with the election to fill the vacancy having been attended by controversy about the electoral process.


Wednesday, March 13, 2024